Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Call for papers - GandALF 2025


If you do research on any of the topics covered by GandALF, do consider submitting a paper to the conference and making the trip to Malta in mid-September!

Call for papers  - GandALF 2025

The Sixteenth International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics, and Formal Verification 
will take place in Valletta, Malta, 15-18 September 2025.


The aim of the symposium is to bring together researchers from
academia and industry who are actively working in the fields of
Games, Automata, Logics, and Formal Verification. The symposium covers
an ample spectrum of themes, ranging from theory to applications, and
encourages cross-fertilization. Papers focused on formal methods are
especially welcome. Authors are invited to submit original research or
tool papers on all relevant topics in these areas. Papers discussing
new ideas that are at an early stage of development are also welcome.

The topics covered by the conference include, but are not limited to,
the following:

Automata Theory
Automated Deduction
Computational aspects of Game Theory
Concurrency and Distributed Computation
Decision Procedures
Deductive, Compositional, and Abstraction Techniques for Verification
Finite Model Theory
First-order and Higher-order Logics
Formal Languages
Formal Methods for Systems Biology, Hybrid, Embedded, and Mobile Systems
Games and Automata for Verification
Game Semantics
Logical aspects of Computational Complexity
Logics of Programs
Modal and Temporal Logics
Model Checking
Models of Reactive and Real-Time Systems
Program Analysis and Software Verification
Run-time Verification and Testing
Specification and Verification of Finite and Infinite-state Systems Synthesis

## Proceedings:

The proceedings will be published by Electronic Proceedings in
Theoretical Computer Science. Authors of the best papers will be
invited to submit a revised version of their work to an special issue
of Acta Informatica. Selected papers from previous editions appeared
in special issues of the International Journal of Foundation of
Computer Science (GandALF 2010), Theoretical Computer Science (GandALF
2011 and 2012), and Information and Computation (GandALF 2013 and
2014).

## Invited Speakers:

- Radu Mardare (Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland)
- more TBA

## Submissions:

Submitted papers should not exceed fourteen (14) pages using EPTCS
format (please use the LaTeX style provided at https://style.eptcs.org),
be unpublished and contain original research. For papers reporting 
experimental results, authors are encouraged to make their data
available with their submission.

Submissions must be in PDF format and will be handled via
EasyChair Conference system at the following address:


## Important dates:

Paper submission deadline: 30 May 2025
Acceptance notification: 4 July 2025
Camera-ready deadline: 25 July 2025

## Program Committee:

Elli Anastasiadi (Aalborg University)
Giorgio Bacci (Aalborg University) co-Chair
Giovanni Bernardi (Université Paris Diderot - IRIF)
Udi Boker (Reichman Universtiy)
Laure Daviaud (University of East Anglia)
Mohammed Foughali (IRIF/Université Paris Cité)
Adrian Francalanza (University of Malta) co-Chair
Silvia Ghilezan (University of Novi Sad)
Daniele Gorla (University of Rome "La Sapienza")
Ryan Kavanagh (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Tim Lyon (Technische Universität Dresden)
Mohammad Reza Mousavi (King's College London)
Ocan Sankur (Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe)
Sarah Winkler (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)
Sarah Winter (IRIF & Université Paris Cité)
... more to be announced

## Steering Committee:

Luca Aceto (Reykjavik University, Iceland)
Javier Esparza (University of Munich, Germany)
Salvatore La Torre (University of Salerno, Italy)
Angelo Montanari (University of Udine, Italy)
Mimmo Parente (University of Salerno, Italy)
Jean-François Raskin (Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)
Martin Zimmermann (Aalborg University, Denmark)

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

What's your opinion on double-blind reviewing in TCS conferences?

Recent discussions with some colleagues spurred me to read again Ran Canetti's white paper on double-blind reviewing in IACR conferences. I also went back to a post by Boaz Barak and to its discussion thread, as well as to this post that motivated it. I was also reminded of the coverage of single- and double-blind reviewing in this chapter of the book "The Science of Science" (see, for instance, page 25 in that file). I recommend all those resources. 

FWIW, I share Ran Canetti's analysis of the pros and cons of double-blind reviewing. At the end of the day, evaluating scientific papers submitted to conferences and journals is largely a subjective exercise. IMHO, this is especially true for conferences where, apart from a number of clear accepts and clear rejects, a PC typically has to choose a small number of papers from a typically much larger pool of "scientifically equivalent" articles. 

Double-blind reviewing and rebuttals are two ways in which our community tries to make the process of selecting a good programme for a conference---which is, after all, the job description of a conference PC---more objective than it really is. However, I keep wondering whether those steps make a difference, especially in addressing bias, in an age where every scientific contribution should be available online in publicly accessible form before it is submitted to a conference. Shouldn't we simply trust the PC chairs of a conference to make sure that the refereeing process and the PC discussion are as thorough as possible, given the time constraints under which they take place? 

What's your opinion on double-blind reviewing as authors, PC members and PC chairs, especially in conferences in TCS, broadly construed? Do you prefer to submit to conferences that implement double-blind reviewing? If so, why?

I'd be grateful if you could post your opinions as comments to this post. 

Tuesday, April 01, 2025

ICE-TCS seminar by Benjamin Moore on "Smoothed analysis for graph isomorphism"

Today, the ICE-TCS seminar series at Reykjavik University hosted a talk by Benjamin Moore (Institute of Science and Technology Austria) who is visiting our postdoctoral researcher Nicolaos Matsakis

Benjamin presented the main results in his paper "Smoothed analysis for graph isomorphism", coauthored with his ISTA colleagues Michael Anastos and Matthew Kwan. (In passing, I just saw that Matthew Kwan received the main prize of the Austrian Mathematical Society last year. Congratulations!) 

To my mind, Benjamin did an excellent job in presenting the context for their exciting (but very technical) contribution and the main ideas that underlie it. Kudos! The work by Benjamin and his collaborators provides another explanation of the effectiveness of the colour refinement algorithm (also known as the one-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm) in checking whether two graphs are isomorphic. I encourage you to read at least the introduction of their paper, which will be presented at STOC 2025, and the ISTA news article here, which does a much better job at putting their work in context than an interested, but ignorant, observer like me ever could. FWIW, I find results like theirs, which offer some explanation as to why theoretically hard problems are seemingly easy in practice, fascinating and I feel like that paper might be a strong candidate for a best paper award. 

It was also fitting to see recent work on smoothed analysis being presented at our seminar series since Daniel Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng received the 2008 Gödel Prize at ICALP 2008, which was held at Reykjavik University. Time flies, but great work is timeless.